MHS619
I currently own a Canon, and I think it's plain and simple that as Rebel user I can attach EF and EF-S lenses and that FD mounts won't work without adapters that usually isn't worth the hassle.
I'm thinking about switching to Nikon but I'm looking around and I don't know what lenses are compatible to let's say a Nikon D5000. So far I feel like it's a lot more than just one or two types.
Okay is that in other words an "F" mount?
Or are there different terms with Nikon than Canon
Answer
All camera manufacturers use a proprietary lens mount.
Canon abandoned the FD lens mount for the EF lens mount when they introduced their 35mm auto focus SLR camera line around 1988. They continued using the EF lens mount when they introduced their first DSLR. In my opinion the introduction of the EF-S line of lower-priced lenses further confused things for Canon owners since the EF-S lenses can't be used on a Canon full-frame DSLR like the 5D or 1D.
Nikon introduced the F lens mount around 1960 and still uses it today on all their DSLR cameras. Nikon lenses labeled DX are designed for cropped sensor DSLRs like the D40, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000, D5100 and D7000. However, they can be used on Nikon full-frame DSLRs like the D700 and D3 but the image size will be the same as that of a cropped sensor DSLR. Nikon lenses labeled FX are designed for the full-frame DSLRs but can be used on the cropped sensor DSLR cameras with no problem.
Minolta introduced the world's first full-featured 35mm auto focus SLR, the Maxxum 7000, in 1985 but abandoned their leagcy SR lens mount for the A (aka Alpha) lens mount. When Sony bought the rights to the Konica-Minolta DSLR camera line they wisely kept the A lens mount. A Minolta Maxxum AF lens made in 1985 is right at home on a Sony DSLR.
Pentax introduced the K lens mount with the Pentax K1000 of 1975. The K lens mount is still used on Pentax DSLR cameras.
Olympus abandoned the OM lens mount for the 4/3 lens mount when they introduced their first DSLR cameras. They and Panasonic now use the Micro 4/3 lens mount for their lines of mirror-less cameras like the Olympus Pen series and the Panasonic G1.
So Nikon has the best backwards compatibility closely followed by Pentax and then Sony.
In my opinion you should keep your Canon and invest in EF lenses for it.
All camera manufacturers use a proprietary lens mount.
Canon abandoned the FD lens mount for the EF lens mount when they introduced their 35mm auto focus SLR camera line around 1988. They continued using the EF lens mount when they introduced their first DSLR. In my opinion the introduction of the EF-S line of lower-priced lenses further confused things for Canon owners since the EF-S lenses can't be used on a Canon full-frame DSLR like the 5D or 1D.
Nikon introduced the F lens mount around 1960 and still uses it today on all their DSLR cameras. Nikon lenses labeled DX are designed for cropped sensor DSLRs like the D40, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000, D5100 and D7000. However, they can be used on Nikon full-frame DSLRs like the D700 and D3 but the image size will be the same as that of a cropped sensor DSLR. Nikon lenses labeled FX are designed for the full-frame DSLRs but can be used on the cropped sensor DSLR cameras with no problem.
Minolta introduced the world's first full-featured 35mm auto focus SLR, the Maxxum 7000, in 1985 but abandoned their leagcy SR lens mount for the A (aka Alpha) lens mount. When Sony bought the rights to the Konica-Minolta DSLR camera line they wisely kept the A lens mount. A Minolta Maxxum AF lens made in 1985 is right at home on a Sony DSLR.
Pentax introduced the K lens mount with the Pentax K1000 of 1975. The K lens mount is still used on Pentax DSLR cameras.
Olympus abandoned the OM lens mount for the 4/3 lens mount when they introduced their first DSLR cameras. They and Panasonic now use the Micro 4/3 lens mount for their lines of mirror-less cameras like the Olympus Pen series and the Panasonic G1.
So Nikon has the best backwards compatibility closely followed by Pentax and then Sony.
In my opinion you should keep your Canon and invest in EF lenses for it.
dslr and super zoom comparison?
Mattamomo(
hey everyone
1) i wanted to know the difference between a dslr camera, and a super zoom camera?
2) i know that with a dslr you can change the lense but what does changing the lense do?
3) comparing these two cameras, which is better and why?
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-panasonic-fz38-digital-camera-black/p1032951
or
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-sony-alpha-a230-digital-slr-body/p1519404
the price would suggest the sony dslr, but the panasonic super zoom has 12.1mp when the sony only has 10.2mp, also i belive the sony has no zoom unless you buy an expensive lense, but the panasonic has 18x zoom.
4) so what makes a dslr Better?????
if anyone can clear any of these questions up it would be hugely appreciated
Answer
DSLRs arent âbetterâ. Theyre a different type of camera. The FZ38 you link to isnât a âpoint n shootâ. Itâs a bridge camera and just like a DSLR its fully adjustable. You can have full control of how the exposure is made if you want the control. If you read many of the posts here on YA youâll see many DSLR buyers are keeping their cameras on auto just as if it were a point n shoot. You can do the same with the FZ38 if you prefer.
As for enjoying the flexibility of a fully adjustable camera you can choose to do that also with the FZ38 using a lens which covers 24-486mm.
You donât absolutely need a class to understand the basics of photography. Exposure and depth of field are really all you need to know. Composition is in the eye of the beholder. There are no rules for composition. Not every subject fits neatly into the rule of thirds.
Large sensors are over emphasized. If large sensors were so important people wouldnât buy cropped sensor DSLRs or even full format DSLRs. They would go for the largest sensors in medium format DSLRs. Small sensor performance has improved considerably
âAre top compact cameras catching up with DSLRs?â
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/DxOMark-reviews/DxOMark-review-for-advanced-compacts
âContrary to conventional wisdom, higher resolution actually compensates for noiseâ
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Insights/More-pixels-offsets-noise!
Yes there are a wide variety of lenses for DSLRs but they can be very expensive. Many DSLR owners never cover any more focal range than what the FZ 38 covers.
DSLRs are great if youre very serious about photography, you have the financial resources to support it, are willing to invest the time to really learn photography and donât mind carrying a bag full of gear with you.
If you simply want a camera to capture some moments at family gatherings a basic point n shoot will be fine.
If you want point n shoot simplicity with the option of manual creative control a bridge camera will be fine.
Not everyone wants, needs or actually should have a DSLR unless your primary concern is to impress others because you have one. For the average person a simple point n shoot is all they really need.
Heres an example
"How do you open up the battery case for photoshop sx110 is?
be specific"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkvEaygkmhTp7bv9lD78xP4z5XNG;_ylv=3?qid=20100412125704AAuYjQP
If they cant even open the battery compartment how well would they do with a DSLR?
Edit:
Im amazed at the arrogance of DSLR owners on YA. As if their puny little crop sensors are absolutely where the line gets drawn for image quality. Get a grip. DSLRs arent the only cameras which take great photos but the truth is too much of a blow to your egos. You want to make everyone who has a point n shoot or bridge camera feel like their cameras are worthless.
The phrase "point n shoot" has nothing to do with sensor sizes. Its an auto everything camera. You just "point n shoot". Many of the DSLR users here on YA have nothing but point n shoots. They cant find their way past the on button to get any decent photos anyway.
Call these superzooms whatever you like. So long as they have the same options to set aperture, ISO, shutter speed and focus they arent point n shoots.
Get those chips off your shoulders. The world doesnt revolve around your DSLRs.
DSLRs arent âbetterâ. Theyre a different type of camera. The FZ38 you link to isnât a âpoint n shootâ. Itâs a bridge camera and just like a DSLR its fully adjustable. You can have full control of how the exposure is made if you want the control. If you read many of the posts here on YA youâll see many DSLR buyers are keeping their cameras on auto just as if it were a point n shoot. You can do the same with the FZ38 if you prefer.
As for enjoying the flexibility of a fully adjustable camera you can choose to do that also with the FZ38 using a lens which covers 24-486mm.
You donât absolutely need a class to understand the basics of photography. Exposure and depth of field are really all you need to know. Composition is in the eye of the beholder. There are no rules for composition. Not every subject fits neatly into the rule of thirds.
Large sensors are over emphasized. If large sensors were so important people wouldnât buy cropped sensor DSLRs or even full format DSLRs. They would go for the largest sensors in medium format DSLRs. Small sensor performance has improved considerably
âAre top compact cameras catching up with DSLRs?â
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/DxOMark-reviews/DxOMark-review-for-advanced-compacts
âContrary to conventional wisdom, higher resolution actually compensates for noiseâ
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Insights/More-pixels-offsets-noise!
Yes there are a wide variety of lenses for DSLRs but they can be very expensive. Many DSLR owners never cover any more focal range than what the FZ 38 covers.
DSLRs are great if youre very serious about photography, you have the financial resources to support it, are willing to invest the time to really learn photography and donât mind carrying a bag full of gear with you.
If you simply want a camera to capture some moments at family gatherings a basic point n shoot will be fine.
If you want point n shoot simplicity with the option of manual creative control a bridge camera will be fine.
Not everyone wants, needs or actually should have a DSLR unless your primary concern is to impress others because you have one. For the average person a simple point n shoot is all they really need.
Heres an example
"How do you open up the battery case for photoshop sx110 is?
be specific"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkvEaygkmhTp7bv9lD78xP4z5XNG;_ylv=3?qid=20100412125704AAuYjQP
If they cant even open the battery compartment how well would they do with a DSLR?
Edit:
Im amazed at the arrogance of DSLR owners on YA. As if their puny little crop sensors are absolutely where the line gets drawn for image quality. Get a grip. DSLRs arent the only cameras which take great photos but the truth is too much of a blow to your egos. You want to make everyone who has a point n shoot or bridge camera feel like their cameras are worthless.
The phrase "point n shoot" has nothing to do with sensor sizes. Its an auto everything camera. You just "point n shoot". Many of the DSLR users here on YA have nothing but point n shoots. They cant find their way past the on button to get any decent photos anyway.
Call these superzooms whatever you like. So long as they have the same options to set aperture, ISO, shutter speed and focus they arent point n shoots.
Get those chips off your shoulders. The world doesnt revolve around your DSLRs.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar